By Liliane Haegeman
During this new publication Liliane Haegeman offers an account of sentential negation inside of a central authority and Binding framework. development at the paintings of Klima and Lasnik, Haegeman demonstrates the parallelism among damaging sentences and interrogative sentences, and offers a unified research when it comes to a well-formedness on syntactic representations: the have an effect on criterion, instantiated because the WH criterion in interrogative sentences and because the NEG criterion in unfavourable sentences. it's proven that during an identical approach that during many languages the WH criterion supplies upward thrust to WH circulate, the NEG criterion can also supply upward push to NEG stream. This e-book could be of curiosity to all these engaged on theoretical syntax, relatively of the Germanic and Romance languages.
Read or Download The Syntax of Negation PDF
Best semantics books
During this groundbreaking e-book, Wierzbicka demonstrates that each language has its «key innovations» and that those key options mirror the center values of the tradition. additional, she argues that inside a culture-independent analytical framework you can still examine, evaluate, or even clarify cultures to outsiders via their key ideas.
During the last two decades or so, lots of the paintings at the syntax of Philippine languages has been involved in the query of even if those languages might be acknowledged to have grammatical topics, and if this is the case which argument of a easy transitive clause could be analysed as being the topic. Paul Kroeger's contribution to this debate asserts that grammatical family corresponding to topic and item are syntactic notions, and has to be pointed out at the foundation of syntactic homes, instead of through semantic roles or discourse features.
This e-book offers an leading edge and novel method of linguistic semantics, ranging from the concept that language should be defined as a mechanism for the expression of linguistic Meanings as specific floor types, or Texts. Semantics is in particular that approach of ideas that guarantees a transition from a Semantic illustration of the that means of a relations of synonymous sentences to the Deep-Syntactic illustration of a specific sentence.
This quantity brings jointly unique papers by way of linguists and philosophers at the function of context and standpoint in language and idea. a number of contributions are curious about the contextualism/relativism debate, which has loomed huge in fresh philosophical discussions. In a considerable creation, the editors survey the sector and map out the correct concerns and positions.
- Pragmatics (Language Workbooks)
- Existence: Semantics and Syntax
- Linguistic Expressions and Semantic Processing: A Practical Approach
- The Tyranny of Words
- Alliteration in Culture
Extra resources for The Syntax of Negation
Again the timing of the movement is morphology-driven. The reader should be aware that for expository reasons I represent the checking formalism in a representational format. As mentioned before, in the Minimalist Program clause structure is assembled stepwise (cf. 2), and the lexical projections are gradually extended by higher functional projections. For a more accurate rendering of the processes of structure building the reader is referred to the literature. 3 Pollock (1993) In his original discussion of the split-Infl hypothesis (1989), Pollock argued that the hierarchy of functional projections in English and French was as in (33a): (33) a.
In (62a), for instance, the WH-operator when heads a chain created by movement; the sentential scope of the WH-phrase in situ is represented by the expletive scope marker which is adjoined to the overt operator. Anticipating the discussion in chapters 2 and especially 4 I represent the expletive scope marker as OP. (62) a. When did you see whom?
Spec,CP] is left-peripheral, and we have argued that, not being associated with one specific grammatical function, it is an A'-position. This means that in fact [Spec,CP] is a scope position. This conclusion is rather welcome in view of the fact that semantically WH-phrases such as who are like quantifiers. The interpretation of (15a) can be represented as in (15b): (15) b. 3 we end up with the following organization of our grammar: 18 Introduction (16) The T-model D-structure S-structure D-structure encodes the lexical properties of the heads, their selectional properties etc.
- Download Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words: English, by Anna Wierzbicka PDF
- Download The sultan’s renegades : Christian-European converts to by Tobias P. Graf PDF