By Pieter A. M. Seuren
The common sense of Language opens a brand new standpoint on common sense. Pieter Seuren argues that the common sense of language derives from the lexical meanings of the logical operators. those meanings, notwithstanding, turn out to not be constant. Seuren solves this challenge via an indepth research of the sensible adequacy of typical predicate good judgment and traditional smooth common sense for average linguistic interplay. He then develops a normal concept of discourse-bound interpretation, masking discourse incrementation, anaphora, presupposition and topic-comment constitution, all of which, the writer claims, shape the 'cement' of discourse constitution. this is often the second one of a two-volume foundational examine of language, released lower than the name Language from inside of. Pieter Seuren discusses such it sounds as if various matters because the ontology underlying the semantics of language, speech act thought, intensionality phenomena, the equipment and ecology of language, sentential and lexical which means, the ordinary common sense of language and cognition, and the intrinsically context-sensitive nature of language - and exhibits them to be in detail associated. all through his formidable company, he keeps a relentless discussion with tested perspectives, reflecting their improvement from historical Greece to the current. The ensuing synthesis matters primary points of study and idea in linguistics, philosophy and cognitive technological know-how.
Read or Download The Logic of Language: Language From Within Volume II PDF
Similar semantics books
During this groundbreaking publication, Wierzbicka demonstrates that each language has its «key options» and that those key techniques mirror the center values of the tradition. additional, she argues that inside of a culture-independent analytical framework you will examine, examine, or even clarify cultures to outsiders via their key thoughts.
Over the past 20 years or so, lots of the paintings at the syntax of Philippine languages has been fascinated by the query of even if those languages could be stated to have grammatical matters, and if this is the case which argument of a easy transitive clause will be analysed as being the topic. Paul Kroeger's contribution to this debate asserts that grammatical kin comparable to topic and item are syntactic notions, and has to be pointed out at the foundation of syntactic homes, instead of by means of semantic roles or discourse capabilities.
This e-book provides an leading edge and novel method of linguistic semantics, ranging from the concept that language may be defined as a mechanism for the expression of linguistic Meanings as specific floor kinds, or Texts. Semantics is in particular that method of principles that guarantees a transition from a Semantic illustration of the which means of a kinfolk of synonymous sentences to the Deep-Syntactic illustration of a specific sentence.
This quantity brings jointly unique papers through linguists and philosophers at the function of context and standpoint in language and idea. a number of contributions are serious about the contextualism/relativism debate, which has loomed huge in fresh philosophical discussions. In a considerable creation, the editors survey the sector and map out the appropriate concerns and positions.
- Refusals in Instructional Contexts and Beyond
- Transformational Syntax and Model Theoretic Semantics: A Case Study in Modern Irish
- Informal Lectures on Formal Semantics
- Language and Human Behavior (The Jessie and John Danz Lectures)
- Restriction and Saturation (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs)
- Predicates and Their Subjects
Extra resources for The Logic of Language: Language From Within Volume II
In fact, logicians have, on the whole, been anxious to safeguard logic from any incursions of multivalence. Since we, too, are threatening the bivalent shelter of standard logic, it is important to state as exactly as possible what is meant by the PRINCIPLE OF BIVALENCE. We deﬁne the Bivalence Principle as consisting of two independent subprinciples: PRINCIPLE OF BIVALENCE (i) SUBPRINCIPLE OF COMPLETE VALUATION OF L-PROPOSITIONS: All well-anchored and well-keyed L-propositions have a truth value.
Yet (radical) negation yields truth in The present king of France is NOT bald (which makes The present king of France is bald radically false), whereas the unkeyed sentence The boy did NOT laugh is as devoid of a truth value as its positive counterpart The boy laughed. It seems preferable, therefore, to avoid the term and the concept ‘undeﬁned’ altogether and distinguish, as we do, between the lack of a truth value when a deﬁnite term is unkeyed and radical falsity when a deﬁnite term is well-keyed but fails to refer to an actually existing object whereas its predicate requires it to do so.
Among the advantages of treating logical operators (constants) as (abstract) predicates are the following—apart from the general consideration that the insight into the nature of logic is greatly enhanced. First, treating logical operators as arguments uniﬁes the format of the semantic deﬁnitions of the logical operators with that of common lexical predicates in that both are statable as satisfaction conditions. This allows one to see with greater clarity than before the relation between logic and language.
- Download Passion Killers by Linda Regan PDF
- Download The Lexicon-Encyclopedia Interface (Current Research in the by Bert Peeters PDF