By Chris Fox
This booklet offers a scientific examine of 3 foundational matters within the semantics of typical language which were rather missed long ago few a long time.
Read or Download Foundations of intensional semantics PDF
Best semantics books
During this groundbreaking e-book, Wierzbicka demonstrates that each language has its «key options» and that those key ideas mirror the center values of the tradition. extra, she argues that inside of a culture-independent analytical framework you can research, examine, or even clarify cultures to outsiders via their key techniques.
Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog
Over the past 20 years or so, lots of the paintings at the syntax of Philippine languages has been considering the query of even if those languages will be stated to have grammatical topics, and if that is so which argument of a uncomplicated transitive clause might be analysed as being the topic. Paul Kroeger's contribution to this debate asserts that grammatical kinfolk similar to topic and item are syntactic notions, and has to be pointed out at the foundation of syntactic homes, instead of via semantic roles or discourse features.
Semantics: From meaning to text
This ebook provides an leading edge and novel method of linguistic semantics, ranging from the concept language could be defined as a mechanism for the expression of linguistic Meanings as specific floor kinds, or Texts. Semantics is in particular that approach of ideas that guarantees a transition from a Semantic illustration of the that means of a family members of synonymous sentences to the Deep-Syntactic illustration of a specific sentence.
Context-Dependence, Perspective and Relativity
This quantity brings jointly unique papers by means of linguists and philosophers at the function of context and standpoint in language and concept. numerous contributions are eager about the contextualism/relativism debate, which has loomed huge in contemporary philosophical discussions. In a considerable advent, the editors survey the sphere and map out the correct concerns and positions.
- Aristotle: Semantics and Ontology, Volume 2: The Metaphysics. Semantics in Aristotle's Strategy of Argument (Philosophia Antiqua)
- Elements of Control: Structure and Meaning in Infinitival Constructions
- Thought-Contents: On the Ontology of Belief and the Semantics of Belief Attribution
- Vagueness: An Investigation into Natural Languages and the Sorites Paradox
- The Parameter of Aspect
- Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics (Language in Society)
Extra info for Foundations of intensional semantics
Sample text
53) A closed Cartesian category (CCC) is a category with sufficient structure to provide a model of a higher-order typed λ-calculus. (54) A CCC contains (a) terminal objects (the categorical counterparts of singleton sets); (b) Cartesian products (corresponding to product types); and (c) exponentials (the counterpart of functional types). (55) For any category with the terminal object 1, we can think of an arrow f : 1 → A as the categorical generalization of the set theoretic notion of a member of A.
This approach permits him to characterize intensions independently of modality. He constructs a proof theory which specifies the relation between intensional identity and provable equivalence in a way that allows for fine-grained intensionality. However, it suffers from a number of serious formal difficulties. First, Bealer’s insistence on using a first-order logic without functional types restricts the expressive power of his system in a way that prevents it from representing central features of natural language semantics.
Alternatives to Fine-Grained Intensionality 15 (2) a is the least upper bound of B iff for every upper bound c of B, a ≤ c. The least upper bound of B is also known as the supremum of B (sup B). (3) For a poset A, a is a lower bound of B ⊆ A iff for every b ∈ B, a ≤ b. (4) a is the greatest lower bound of B iff for every lower bound c of B, c ≤ a. The greatest lower bound of B is also known as the infimum of B (inf B). If a poset has a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound, they are unique by virtue of the antisymmetry of the partial order relation ≤.
