Download Advances in Proof-Theoretic Semantics by Thomas Piecha, Peter Schroeder-Heister PDF

By Thomas Piecha, Peter Schroeder-Heister

This quantity is the 1st ever assortment dedicated to the sector of proof-theoretic semantics. Contributions tackle themes together with the systematics of advent and removal principles and proofs of normalization, the categorial characterization of deductions, the relation among Heyting's and Gentzen's techniques to which means, knowability paradoxes, proof-theoretic foundations of set idea, Dummett's justification of logical legislation, Kreisel's conception of buildings, paradoxical reasoning, and the defence of version theory.

The box of proof-theoretic semantics has existed for nearly 50 years, however the time period itself was once proposed through Schroeder-Heister within the Nineteen Eighties. Proof-theoretic semantics explains the that means of linguistic expressions regularly and of logical constants particularly by way of the thought of facts. This quantity emerges from displays on the moment foreign convention on Proof-Theoretic Semantics in Tübingen in 2013, the place contributing authors have been requested to supply a self-contained description and research of an important study query during this quarter. The contributions are consultant of the sphere and will be of curiosity to logicians, philosophers, and mathematicians alike.

Show description

Read or Download Advances in Proof-Theoretic Semantics PDF

Similar semantics books

Understanding Cultures through Their Key Words: English, Russian, Polish, German, and Japanese (Oxford Studies in Anthropological Linguistics)

During this groundbreaking booklet, Wierzbicka demonstrates that each language has its «key suggestions» and that those key recommendations replicate the center values of the tradition. additional, she argues that inside of a culture-independent analytical framework possible research, examine, or even clarify cultures to outsiders via their key thoughts.

Phrase Structure and Grammatical Relations in Tagalog

During the last 20 years or so, many of the paintings at the syntax of Philippine languages has been considering the query of even if those languages could be stated to have grammatical topics, and if that is so which argument of a easy transitive clause may be analysed as being the topic. Paul Kroeger's contribution to this debate asserts that grammatical family members equivalent to topic and item are syntactic notions, and needs to be pointed out at the foundation of syntactic homes, instead of by means of semantic roles or discourse features.

Semantics: From meaning to text

This ebook provides an cutting edge and novel method of linguistic semantics, ranging from the concept language could be defined as a mechanism for the expression of linguistic Meanings as specific floor varieties, or Texts. Semantics is in particular that approach of principles that guarantees a transition from a Semantic illustration of the that means of a kin of synonymous sentences to the Deep-Syntactic illustration of a specific sentence.

Context-Dependence, Perspective and Relativity

This quantity brings jointly unique papers via linguists and philosophers at the function of context and standpoint in language and notion. numerous contributions are concerned about the contextualism/relativism debate, which has loomed huge in contemporary philosophical discussions. In a considerable creation, the editors survey the sphere and map out the correct matters and positions.

Extra info for Advances in Proof-Theoretic Semantics

Sample text

In: Heyting, A. ) Constructivity of Mathematics, pp. 101–128. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1959) 11. : On weak completeness of intuitionistic predicate logic. J. Symb. Log. 27, 139-158 (1962) 12. : Foundations of intuitionistic logic. , et al. ) Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science, pp. 198-212. Stanford University Press, Stanford (1962) 13. : Book reviews, the collected papers of Gerhard Gentzen. J. Philos. 68, 238–265 (1971) 14. : Hauptsatz for the intuitionistic theory of iterated inductive definitions.

Third, the proof relation R(A, p) must be understood to satisfy the analogs of ExpRfn and Dec18 which are employed at steps (2 ), (2 ), and (3 ). Fourth, it must support the sort of first-order reasoning which stands behind the use of universal generalization and instantiation employed at steps (3 ), (4 ), and (5 ). And fifth, it must also support the use of an appropriate analog to Int applicable to reasoning mediated by all of the prior forms of reasoning about the proof relation. Although the system T which we sketched in Sect.

1 The Language of T Described in general terms, T is an equational term calculus with pairing, projection, and lambda abstraction operators, application, as well as various other primitive terms dissertation [16] provides the most comprehensive exposition of T ω , inclusive of the interpretation of intuitionistic first-order logic, Heyting arithmetic, and accompanying consistency and faithfulness proofs. But whereas in [16] the Kreisel-Goodman paradox is presented informally, [17] contains a more detailed derivation in theory (similar or identical to what we will call T + ) which is similar to the “starred” variant originally described by Kreisel [25].

Download PDF sample

Download Advances in Proof-Theoretic Semantics by Thomas Piecha, Peter Schroeder-Heister PDF
Rated 4.73 of 5 – based on 36 votes